We don't do stars...
We don't do thumbs...
We read children's books and grade them in 10 categories:
literary quality
plot
voice
originality
descriptive ability
humor (if attempted)
illustrations (if present)
believability of characters
believability of situations
overall reading enjoyment

There is no grading curve. There are no points for classroom participation. There is no extra credit.
If you disagree, come speak to us after class.

The Grading System

A+.....this means (guess what) we think it's great. So great it surprised even us.
A.....this means it's pretty darn good. A book we'd recommend to just about everyone we know.
B.....better than most. Not exactly Shakespeare for kids, though, if you get our drift.
C.....mediocre. Like the color beige, it didn't stand out.
D.....we didn't like it. There were more bad aspects than good ones.
F.....it reeked of badness. We read it over and over when we are in dire need of hysterical laughter.
F-.....We're pretty sure Dante had a circle of hell for the people who wrote these...and a lower circle for those who published them.

Monday, April 27, 2009

Special Topic: Popular vs. Classic Books

Ok, so it’s the quintessential question, isn’t it? And probably will never be answered completely satisfactorily. But I feel it’s worth addressing considering some of the books I’ve been reading lately.
The obvious truth is: some books last, some don’t. What some people don’t want to admit is that whether or not a book lasts is not left completely up to luck and fate. Every year, hundreds of books appear on the shelves of our bookstores, fill the warehouses of online stores, make their way to libraries and homes. While they may be enjoyed by many individuals, the great majority of them won’t be in the bookstores or warehouses next year. In ten years, they’ll be in the library book sale stacks, because of the simple fact that no one is reading them anymore.
Does this mean the books are bad? Not necessarily, and in many cases, just plain no. Often these fly-by-night books address topics and issues which are very relevant to today’s readers. In the case of Young Adult and Children’s books, these books can be very important in helping readers deal with the issues they face every day.
However, while these books may not actually be bad, it has to be acknowledged that other books are simply better. As Aristotle wrote in his Poetics, “Clearly, then…the soul of tragedy is the plot [Aristotle was kinda obsessed with tragedy, but he is also talking about literary works in general here], and second in importance is character,” and, “the larger the plot is, while still remaining perspicuous [look it up], the more beautiful it is in virtue of its magnitude,” and, “poetry tends [Aristotle used the term poetry to indicate fiction, as opposed to history]…to express the universal.” (And don’t complain about me using Aristotle: it’s lasted over two millennia—that makes it classic classic.)
What I derive from Aristotle is that for a work to be really beautiful, or great, it has to: 1) express a universal truth—universal meaning it is relevant to readers in any time period, not just the present; 2) focus on both plot and character and not just one or the other—but plot is more important, because characters are…well…everywhere, but a plot makes it drama; and 3) contain a plot of a certain magnitude, complexity, and importance.
It’s easy to find books that meet these criteria, both in “classic” and “modern” literature. Take The Lord of the Rings. Or A Wrinkle in Time. The Giver. Johnny Tremain. The Graveyard Book. Black Beauty. Or even Harry Potter, though language-aficionados will complain about that one. Some of those books are decades old, some are new, some are still on the bestseller list. What they have in common is a dynamic plot, real and unique characters, and a universal truth that is expressed through them. There were hundreds of popular books from the decades of LOTR and Johnny Tremain that almost everyone has forgotten (trust me—I’ve read the old Horn Books). You probably can’t name 50 books from the years Harry Potter came out, unless you have a really good memory. You may not even be able to name two dozen from last year.
But you’ll remember the great ones. And so will your children…and their children…and probably their children.
Any thoughts? I'd love to hear your opinions on which modern books will still be around in 50 or 100 years!

3 comments:

GirlwiththeBraids said...

I think modern day books won't last as long as classics because classics have better grammar, for one. So there will always be someone talking about them.

In modern day books, there is modern day humor, some of which will not be understood in 20 years. (Like, He was as cute as Nate from Gossip Girl.) Also in books nowadays, there are main topics and such, that not everyone approves of. So there will always be someone who isn't happy with them. But there will always be who isn't happy with classics, either.

Oh, this is making my brain hurt! Have fun trying to figure out what I meant. ;)

Anonymous said...

You are now, without a doubt, my favorite book blog.

The book that has most influenced my writing is Aristotle's POETICS, and his insistance that we come to know a character through his actions; that through what he does next that we understand who he (the character) is beccoming.

Beautiful. No artificial separation of character from story, but the melding/molding of the two into a wonderful unity.

Plus, I love your grading system! So much more flexible than thumbs up/down/whatever.

Linda

The Book Reporter said...

Thank you! It's quite true...Aristotle is amazing. I always find it funny that he said thousands of years ago what people are saying now as if it were a newly-revealed truth. That's one guy who deserves his fame.